02-11-05 | 11:28 a.m.
for-you-only(2)
This is a re-review. I am beyond harsh on re-reviews. Not to mention I'm more of a bitch than Tracey just in general... so there you go. Don't say I didn't warn ya...
Name | for-you-only
Title | ...xxx...Love Me...xxx...
First Impression | Oh. My. Goodness. ||1/5||
Template / Layout | No. Plain and simple. No. This layout does not make me happy. No it does not. I thought you said in your request that you had altered your layout since you were last reviewed. It looks to me like all you did was switch the link-picture thingys around and change up some of the font stuff. Not a big enough change, kiddo. Sorry. All the images are distracting. Don't you want people to read your entries, not get stuck looking at pictures and shit? This layout looks kind of thrown together and cluttered. It just does not appeal to my poor, poor eyes. I will give you some credit for it being self designed. At least you thought it all out on your own...but, really, what I wanna know is, what were you thinking?. 1/10
If it's possible to give 10 points for my liking a layout... this one gets, well, none of them. I dislike this layout more every time I look at it. Meh. If you are going to change up your layout... change it. Like, drastically. Switch it all up... don't just re-vamp the existing madness. 0/10
TOTAL OF LAYOUT ||1/20||
Contacts | E-mail. Comments. Notes. ||3/5||
Navigation / Organization | Simplicity. The navigation is easy as it gets... though the images bother me and create the feel of disorganization. Your page also looks a bit cluttered. Yeah. And I also think your archive page makes your diary seem more, I dunno, kind of crappy because it doesn't match the main layout.||4/10||
Errors | Grammar, spelling, and some word usage errors. None that make me want to smack you ((hard)) though.||2/5||
Content | Some of what you say I can relate to. Some of it I just shake my head at. You tend to write quite blatantly and straight-forward... but at times it all feels somewhat contrived and attention-starved. The one thing I can say is that I wanted to read more, just to see what type of shit would show up in each entry. You held my interest, but I don't know if it was for the right reasons or not. Your writings made me sit back and go, "Hmmm-", and I guess thats a good thing. 15/25
You write like a teenaged girl. ((Which makes sense, seeing as that is what you are.)) You spout out feelings and detailed accounts of sex and relationship issues... and you just put your shit out there without a thought as to what people will think. You seem to write for audience, any way, though... which leaves me feeling confused. Slow down in your writing and you will have less spelling, grammar, and word usage errors. 10/20
TOTAL CONTENT ||25/45||
Extras | You have some... but they hold my interest not at all. Meh. ||2/5||
Repeat Visits? | Nope. ||1/5||
Extra Credit | +1 for pictures. I agree with Tracey, pictures are good... but dude, why are there so many images of eyeballs... and um, maybe you should consider more clothing in your pictures. Just an idea... but yeah, boobs and bras and your body and all that may not be every one else's cup of tea.
Final Score | You did better the first time. ||40/100||
Comments | Get rid of your layout and put on some clothes for crying out loud... you'll catch a chill.
Reviewed By | Stinky Tinky